Where does your team
really stand with AI? Stop guessing.
Start knowing.

Our AI/44 diagnostic measures your workforce's AI readiness: mindset, skills, judgment and the support system around them. In less time than a morning coffee break, we assess what people can actually do with AI, not just what they say, so you can prepare the right people on the right things.

Vetergy CBC Supreme Services Strongman Group SAP Northwestern Medicine HomeEquity Bank Geneva Centre for Autism Garland Canada Brampton Brick Cornerstone Canadian Marketing Association ACA Group

How ready are your people? And how ready do they think you are?

The AI/44 Workforce Assessment scores both: how ready your people are, and how ready they think your company is. It benchmarks every number against thousands of records in the AI/44 Index, so you can see where you're ahead, where you're behind, and where to act first.

See a sample report
AI/44 Workforce Scorecard

View one:your people.

Every person is measured on four pillars: mindset, skills, application and judgment.

The diagnostic grew out of our own research into what drives AI adoption, and what blocks it. These four pillars are what made the difference.

Pillar
The Question
What We Measure
AI Openness
Are they willing?
Attitudes toward AI at work and in life, optimism or anxiety, and how they feel about the pace of change.
AI Knowledge & Skills
Can they actually do it?
A live prompt test scored in real time, plus scenarios on confident-sounding statistics and generic output.
Ability to Apply AI
Is it showing up in their work?
How often they use AI, for which tasks, the impact, and the use cases they can see but aren’t using yet.
Awareness of AI Risks & Ethics
Do they know the red lines?
Real business scenarios on data leakage, bias in decisions about people, and acting on unverified output.

We don’t just ask nicely. We test.

Most AI assessments ask people to rate themselves. The problem is that confidence and capability aren’t the same thing. People who feel ready often aren’t, and people who doubt themselves are often further along than they think.

So we ask about attitudes and usage, then we test the two skills that matter most. Each person writes a real prompt, scored live by AI using our proprietary scoring rubric. Then they work through real business scenarios that test their judgment: when to trust an AI answer, and when to check it.

The advantage: you train people on the skills they actually lack, not the ones they say they lack. And when you re-test, you see real progress, not a change in confidence.

91% of people know a vague prompt needs rewriting. Their average prompt test score: 5.2 out of 10.

Together, these four pillars make up your workforce’s Individual AI Readiness score.

View two:your company.

The same people then tell us how ready they think your company is. It’s not an audit of your org chart. It’s whether the plan, the rules and the training are actually reaching them.

Across the AI/44 Index, only 1 in 4 employees say leadership has communicated a clear AI plan.

Area
The Question
What we ask your people
Communication
Has the plan been shared clearly?
How well leadership has communicated a clear plan for AI.
Leadership
Are leaders listening?
Whether people feel leadership understands how they feel about AI.
Governance
Do they know the rules?
How clear the policy is on using AI tools at work.
Training
Is it working?
How effective the training and coaching has been.
Culture
Is it safe to try?
Whether they can experiment and learn without fear, and what helps or blocks adoption on their team.

Your people can tell you whether the plan is clear. Whether it’s the right plan is what we work out with your leadership team, and that work becomes the backbone of your roadmap.

Together, these five areas make up your Company AI Readiness score.

Two views.One diagnosis.

Both views feed the diagnosis. Where Individual AI Readiness and Company AI Readiness land against each other tells you which problem you have, and which fix it needs. That diagnosis becomes your roadmap.

Training won’t fix a policy problem. A policy won’t fix a skills problem.

Strong org, people behind

Build Skills

The plan, policy and tools are in place. The capability to use them isn’t.

Both strong

Accelerate

Foundations are solid. Move to workflow redesign and scale.

Both weak

Foundational Reset

Start with literacy and a clear, communicated plan.

People ahead, org behind

Fix the Org

Your people are ahead of your policy, and working outside the guardrails.

Individual AI Readiness, low to high →
↑ Company AI Readiness, low to high.

There is no magic pill.

Get a baseline. Everything else starts there.